American Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Systems
The American Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Systems follows a rigorous, transparent, and ethical peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality, original, and scientifically sound research. The journal is committed to maintaining academic integrity, fairness, confidentiality, and objectivity throughout the review process.
The journal operates a Double-Blind Peer Review system.
The identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other.
This ensures impartial evaluation and minimizes bias related to authorship, institution, nationality, or gender.
Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes an initial screening by the Editorial Office to assess:
Relevance to the journal’s scope
Originality and novelty of the work
Compliance with submission guidelines
Language quality and structure
Plagiarism and ethical compliance
Manuscripts that do not meet these basic requirements may be rejected without external review.
Each eligible manuscript is assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers.
Reviewers are selected based on their subject expertise, academic background, and publication record.
Editors ensure there is no conflict of interest between authors and reviewers.
Reviewers are requested to evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:
Originality and significance of the research
Technical soundness and methodological rigor
Clarity of objectives, analysis, and conclusions
Relevance to artificial intelligence and intelligent systems
Quality of references and citation practices
Ethical compliance and research integrity
Minimum review duration: 10–12 days
Maximum review duration: 5–6 weeks, depending on reviewer availability and revision requirements
Authors are kept informed about the status of their manuscript throughout the review process.
Based on the evaluation, reviewers may recommend one of the following decisions:
Accept without revision
Accept with minor revisions
Accept with major revisions
Reject
The final publication decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor.
Authors receiving revision requests must submit a revised manuscript along with a point-by-point response to reviewer comments.
Revised submissions may be sent back to reviewers for further evaluation if required.
Failure to address reviewer comments adequately may result in rejection.
Maintain strict confidentiality of manuscripts
Provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback
Disclose any conflict of interest
Avoid using unpublished content for personal advantage
Submit original and unpublished work
Avoid plagiarism, data fabrication, or manipulation
Disclose conflicts of interest
Ensure ethical approval where applicable
All manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection tools.
Manuscripts containing plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate submission, or unethical AI-generated content are rejected immediately.
The journal follows COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines in handling misconduct cases.
The peer review process is conducted in a transparent, unbiased, and confidential manner. Editorial decisions are based solely on scholarly merit, relevance, and ethical compliance.
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a reasoned request to the Editorial Office.
Appeals are reviewed by a senior editor or independent editorial board member.
The decision after appeal is final.
The journal recognizes the valuable contribution of reviewers in maintaining publication quality and may issue reviewer certificates upon request.
The peer review policy is reviewed periodically to align with evolving best practices, indexing requirements, and international publication standards.
The American Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Systems is committed to upholding the highest standards of peer review to ensure credibility, quality, and trust in scholarly publishing.