eISSN: Applied editor@oxfordianfoundation.com
Open Access

Quantum Technology Trajectories, Artificial Intelligence Integration, and Patent Network Dynamics in the Global Innovation System

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Quantum technology has entered a decisive stage of its historical evolution, often referred to as the second quantum revolution, characterized not only by fundamental breakthroughs in quantum physics but also by the rapid translation of these discoveries into industrial and commercial applications. The emergence of quantum computing, quantum communication, quantum sensing, and quantum artificial intelligence has reshaped innovation systems across the world, generating unprecedented interactions between public research institutions, private firms, national innovation policies, and global markets. This article provides a comprehensive and theoretically grounded analysis of the evolution of quantum technology by integrating patent network analysis, economic theories of technological change, and scientometric models of knowledge production. Building on recent empirical and conceptual studies, this research interprets quantum technology not as an isolated scientific field but as a complex techno social system embedded within artificial intelligence, healthcare, digital platforms, and regulatory frameworks.

The study develops an integrated framework that connects patent network structures, research funding mechanisms, and interdisciplinary knowledge flows to the observed acceleration of quantum technology development. Drawing on the insights of Jiang and Chen on patent landscapes, McKinsey on industrial scaling, and Coccia on technological evolution and research variability, the article explains how quantum technologies follow nonlinear and path dependent trajectories shaped by competitive substitution, public private research interactions, and the probabilistic nature of scientific discovery. Theoretical arguments from scientometrics and innovation studies are used to show how patent citations, co citation networks, and core documents reveal the emergence of dominant quantum paradigms and technological bottlenecks.

A central contribution of this research is the demonstration that artificial intelligence and quantum science form a mutually reinforcing system of co evolution, in which each technology amplifies the discovery, diffusion, and application potential of the other. Studies on quantum optical neural networks, smart healthcare, and hybrid intelligence illustrate how these technologies jointly redefine industrial competitiveness and social welfare. Furthermore, legal and regulatory analyses are incorporated to show how privacy, governance, and intellectual property regimes are becoming critical determinants of the future quantum economy.

Keywords

References

πŸ“„ 1. Ardito L, Coccia M, Messeni Petruzzelli A. Technological exaptation and crisis management Evidence from COVID 19 outbreaks. R and D Management. 2021;51:381 to 392.
πŸ“„ 2. Coccia M. The interaction between public and private R and D expenditure and national productivity. Prometheus Critical Studies in Innovation. 2011;29:121 to 130.
πŸ“„ 3. Coccia M. What is the optimal rate of R and D investment to maximize productivity growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2009;76:433 to 446.
πŸ“„ 4. Coccia M. Optimization in R and D intensity and tax on corporate profits for supporting labor productivity of nations. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2017;43:792 to 814.
πŸ“„ 5. Coccia M. Competition between basic and applied research in the organizational behaviour of public research labs. Journal of Economic Library. 2018;5:118 to 133.
πŸ“„ 6. Coccia M. Theorem of not independence of any technological innovation. Journal of Economic Bibliography. 2018;5:29 to 35.
πŸ“„ 7. Coccia M. Comparative Institutional Changes. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration Public Policy and Governance. Springer. 2019.
πŸ“„ 8. Coccia M. Evolutionary trajectories of the nanotechnology research across worldwide economic players. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 2012;24:1029 to 1050.
πŸ“„ 9. Coccia M. Promising technologies for fostering simultaneous environmental and socioeconomic sustainability. Journal of Economic and Social Thought. 2023;10:28 to 47.
πŸ“„ 10. Coccia M. New Directions in Quantum Technologies. Journal of Economic Bibliography. 2022;9:21 to 39.
πŸ“„ 11. Coccia M. Bolstering effect in the interaction between artificial intelligence and quantum science for scientific and technological development. Advance Preprints. 2024.
πŸ“„ 12. Coccia M. Law of variability in science driving technological evolution. Preprints. 2023.
πŸ“„ 13. Coccia M. Variability in Research Topics Driving Different Technological Trajectories. Preprints. 2024.
πŸ“„ 14. Coccia M. Probability of discoveries between research fields to explain scientific and technological change. Technology in Society. 2022;68:101874.
πŸ“„ 15. Coccia M. New Perspectives in Innovation Failure Analysis. Technology in Society. 2023;75:102384.
πŸ“„ 16. Dong S, Chen H. Artificial intelligence and IoT based optical quantum computing application legal implications in privacy and regulatory analysis. Optical and Quantum Electronics. 2024;56:556.
πŸ“„ 17. Dowling JP, Milburn GJ. Quantum technology The second quantum revolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 2003;361:1655 to 1674.
πŸ“„ 18. Glanzel W, Thijs B. Using core documents for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics. 2011;91:399 to 416.
πŸ“„ 19. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. Patents Citations and Innovations A Window on the Knowledge Economy. MIT Press. 2002.
πŸ“„ 20. Jiang SY, Chen SL. Exploring landscapes of quantum technology with Patent Network Analysis. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 2021;33:1317 to 1331.
πŸ“„ 21. Jovanovic M, Sjodin D, Parida V. Co evolution of platform architecture platform services and platform governance. Technovation. 2022;118:102218.
πŸ“„ 22. Krinkin K, Shichkina Y, Ignatyev A. Co evolutionary hybrid intelligence is a key concept for the world intellectualization. Kybernetes. 2022;52:2907 to 2923.
πŸ“„ 23. Leydesdorff L. Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2007;59:278 to 287.
πŸ“„ 24. Leydesdorff L, Rafols I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals. Journal of Informetrics. 2011;5:87 to 100.
πŸ“„ 25. Magee C, Basnet S, Funk J, Benson C. Quantitative empirical trends in technical performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2016;104:237 to 246.
πŸ“„ 26. McKinsey. Quantum Technology Monitor. McKinsey and Company. 2023.
πŸ“„ 27. Mosleh M, Roshani S, Coccia M. Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science. Scientometrics. 2022;127:1931 to 1951.
πŸ“„ 28. Roshani S, Bagherylooieh MR, Mosleh M, Coccia M. What is the relationship between research funding and citation based performance. Scientometrics. 2021;126:7859 to 7874.
πŸ“„ 29. Sahal D. Patterns of Technological Innovation. Addison Wesley. 1981.
πŸ“„ 30. Silva FN, Rodrigues FA, Oliveira ON, Costa LF. Quantifying the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals and fields. Journal of Informetrics. 2013;7:469 to 477.
πŸ“„ 31. Small H. Co citation in the scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1973;24:265 to 269.
πŸ“„ 32. Vespignani A. Predicting the Behavior of Techno Social Systems. Science. 2009;325:425 to 428.
πŸ“„ 33. Zhou T, Anuradha T, Mahendra SJ, Webber JL, Mehbodniya A, Wang J, Subrahmanyam K. Efficient and economical smart healthcare application based on quantum optical neural network. Optical and Quantum Electronics. 2024;56:445.
Views: 0    Downloads: 0
Views
Downloads