eISSN: Applied editor@oxfordianfoundation.com

American Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Complex Network Structures in Culinary, Social, and Information Systems: A Unified Network Science Framework for Ingredient Graphs, Diffusion Dynamics, and Community Detection

Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Germany

Abstract

Background: Network science has evolved into a foundational paradigm for understanding complex systems across domains ranging from social interactions to biological metabolism and technological infrastructures. Foundational works on small world networks, scale free topologies, and community structures have revealed universal structural regularities in complex systems. Simultaneously, digital traces generated through online platforms have enabled large scale empirical investigations of social media, collaboration networks, and culinary datasets. Recent research demonstrates that food recipes, ingredient co occurrence networks, and digital culinary interactions exhibit structural patterns analogous to those found in social and technological networks. However, existing scholarship often treats these domains in isolation, leaving an integrative theoretical framework underdeveloped.

Objective: This study develops a unified theoretical and empirical framework that integrates classical network science with computational social systems and culinary network analysis. Drawing exclusively from established literature in network topology, small world theory, scale free networks, community detection, anomaly detection, diffusion processes, and recipe datasets, the article synthesizes theoretical foundations and applies them to ingredient networks, social diffusion, and information credibility systems.

Methods: The methodology integrates structural network analysis, community detection using modularity based and refined algorithms, clustering coefficient estimation, random walk based sampling, centrality analysis, and content driven computational methods including natural language processing. Empirical grounding is derived conceptually from recipe datasets, biomedical collaboration networks, and social media datasets. Ingredient networks are modeled as co occurrence graphs, and theoretical insights from scale free and small world models are applied to analyze connectivity, diffusion, robustness, and substitution dynamics. Rumor detection and anomaly detection frameworks are incorporated to examine information integrity in food related and social media contexts.

Results: The analysis demonstrates that ingredient networks exhibit scale free characteristics, high clustering, and short path lengths consistent with ultrasmall properties. Community structures correspond to regional cuisines and functional ingredient clusters. Opinion leader theory and eigenvector centrality illuminate diffusion of culinary innovations and dietary trends. Knowledge graph approaches enable structured ingredient substitution modeling. Social media analytics reveal how emerging topics in food discourse propagate through temporally and structurally constrained networks. Theoretical extrapolation suggests that culinary ecosystems mirror biological metabolic networks and technological infrastructures in both topology and vulnerability.

Conclusion: The convergence of network science, computational social systems, and culinary data analytics reveals a coherent structural paradigm governing heterogeneous complex systems. By integrating ingredient networks with theories of diffusion, anomaly detection, and community detection, this work advances a unified interpretative framework. Future research should deepen cross domain modeling, develop longitudinal network evolution models, and integrate semantic and structural features for enhanced interpretability and resilience.

Keywords

References

πŸ“„ 1. Backstrom L., Boldi P., Rosa M., Ugander J., Vigna S. (2012). Four degrees of separation. In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM web science conference. Association for Computing Machinery.
πŸ“„ 2. Barabasi A. L. (2014). Network science. Cambridge University Press.
πŸ“„ 3. Barabasi A. L., Albert R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509 to 512.
πŸ“„ 4. Barabasi A. L., Albert R., Jeong H. (1999). Mean field theory for scale free random networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 272(1 to 2), 173 to 187.
πŸ“„ 5. Barabasi A. L., Bonabeau E. (2003). Scale free networks. Scientific American, 288(5), 60 to 69.
πŸ“„ 6. Bian J., Xie M., Topaloglu U., Hudson T., Eswaran H., Hogan W. (2014). Social network analysis of biomedical research collaboration networks in a CTSA institution. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 52, 130 to 140.
πŸ“„ 7. Blondel V. D., Guillaume J. L., Lambiotte R., Lefebvre E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008.
πŸ“„ 8. Cancho R. F. I., Sole R. V. (2001). The small world of human language. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 268(1482), 2261 to 2265.
πŸ“„ 9. Cataldi M., Di Caro L., Schifanella C. (2010). Emerging topic detection on Twitter based on temporal and social terms evaluation. In Proceedings of the tenth international workshop on multimedia data mining. Association for Computing Machinery.
πŸ“„ 10. Chandola V., Banerjee A., Kumar V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1 to 58.
πŸ“„ 11. Cheng X., Lin S. Y., Wang K., Hong Y. A., Zhao X., Gress D., Wojtusiak J., Cheskin L. J., Xue H. (2021). Healthfulness assessment of recipes shared on Pinterest: Natural language processing and content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e25757.
πŸ“„ 12. Cho Y., Hwang J., Lee D. (2012). Identification of effective opinion leaders in the diffusion of technological innovation: A social network approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(1), 97 to 106.
πŸ“„ 13. Cohen R., Havlin S. (2003). Scale free networks are ultrasmall. Physical Review Letters, 90(5), 058701.
πŸ“„ 14. de Sola Pool I., Kochen M. (1978). Contacts and influence. Social Networks, 1(1), 5 to 51.
πŸ“„ 15. Ebel H., Mielsch L. I., Bornholdt S. (2002). Scale free topology of email networks. Physical Review E, 66(3), 035103.
πŸ“„ 16. Ghani N. A., Hamid S., Hashem I. A. T., Ahmed E. (2019). Social media big data analytics: A survey. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 417 to 428.
πŸ“„ 17. Herrera J. C. (2021). The contribution of network science to the study of food recipes: A review paper. Appetite, 159, 105048.
πŸ“„ 18. i Cancho R. F., Janssen C., Sole R. V. (2001). Topology of technology graphs: Small world patterns in electronic circuits. Physical Review E, 64(4), 046119.
πŸ“„ 19. Jain K. (2020). 6000 plus Indian food recipes dataset. Mendeley Data.
πŸ“„ 20. Jeong H., Tombor B., Albert R., Oltvai Z. N., Barabasi A. L. (2000). The large scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature, 407(6804), 651 to 654.
πŸ“„ 21. Katzir L., Hardiman S. J. (2015). Estimating clustering coefficients and size of social networks via random walk. ACM Transactions on the Web, 9(4), 1 to 20.
πŸ“„ 22. Khanna S., Chattopadhyay C., Kundu S. (2023). INDoRI: Indian dataset of recipes and ingredients and its ingredient network. In International conference on complex networks and their applications. Springer.
πŸ“„ 23. Liu Y., Liu A., Liu X., Huang X. (2019). A statistical approach to participant selection in location based social networks for offline event marketing. Information Sciences, 480, 90 to 108.
πŸ“„ 24. Milgram S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2(1), 60 to 67.
πŸ“„ 25. Min W., Liu L., Luo Z., Jiang S. (2019). Ingredient guided cascaded multi attention network for food recognition. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on multimedia. Association for Computing Machinery.
πŸ“„ 26. Mohammad S., Kiritchenko S., Sobhani P., Zhu X., Cherry C. (2016). Semeval 2016 task 6: Detecting stance in tweets. In Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on semantic evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics.
πŸ“„ 27. Montoya J. M., Sole R. V. (2002). Small world patterns in food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 214(3), 405 to 412.
πŸ“„ 28. Moreno J. L. (1941). Foundations of sociometry: An introduction. Sociometry, 4(1), 15 to 35.
πŸ“„ 29. Newman M. E. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks I: Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131.
πŸ“„ 30. Newman M. E., Barabasi A. L., Watts D. J. (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press.
πŸ“„ 31. Newman M. E., Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. (2002). Random graph models of social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl_1), 2566 to 2572.
πŸ“„ 32. Nyati U., Rawat S., Gupta D., Aggrawal N., Arora A. (2021). Characterize ingredient network for recipe suggestion. International Journal of Information Technology, 13, 2323 to 2330.
πŸ“„ 33. Pagani G. A., Aiello M. (2013). The power grid as a complex network: A survey. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392(11), 2688 to 2700.
πŸ“„ 34. Prabhavalkar N. Indian food 101. Kaggle dataset.
πŸ“„ 35. Shirai S. S., Seneviratne O., Gordon M. E., Chen C. H., McGuinness D. L. (2021). Identifying ingredient substitutions using a knowledge graph of food. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 621766.
πŸ“„ 36. South T., Roughan M., Mitchell L. (2020). Popularity and centrality in Spotify networks: Critical transitions in eigenvector centrality. Journal of Complex Networks, 8(6), cnaa050.
πŸ“„ 37. Tabassum S., Pereira F. S., Fernandes S., Gama J. (2018). Social network analysis: An overview. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8(5), e1256.
πŸ“„ 38. Teng C. Y., Lin Y. R., Adamic L. A. (2012). Recipe recommendation using ingredient networks. In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM web science conference. Association for Computing Machinery.
πŸ“„ 39. Traag V. A., Waltman L., Van Eck N. J. (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well connected communities. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1 to 12.
πŸ“„ 40. Travers J., Milgram S. (1977). An experimental study of the small world problem. In Social networks. Academic Press.
πŸ“„ 41. Valverde S., Cancho R. F., Sole R. V. (2002). Scale free networks from optimal design. Europhysics Letters, 60(4), 512.
πŸ“„ 42. Vazquez A., Pastor Satorras R., Vespignani A. (2002). Internet topology at the router and autonomous system level. arXiv preprint cond mat 0206084.
πŸ“„ 43. Wang F. Y. (2017). Computational social systems in a new period: A fast transition into the third axial age. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 4(3), 52 to 53.
πŸ“„ 44. Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of small world networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440 to 442.
πŸ“„ 45. Williams R. J., Berlow E. L., Dunne J. A., Barabasi A. L., Martinez N. D. (2002). Two degrees of separation in complex food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(20), 12913 to 12916.
πŸ“„ 46. Yummly (2024). Recipe ingredients dataset. Kaggle.
πŸ“„ 47. Zhang Q., Zhang S., Dong J., Xiong J., Cheng X. (2015). Automatic detection of rumor on social network. In Natural language processing and Chinese computing. Springer.
Views: 0    Downloads: 0
Views
Downloads