eISSN: Applied editor@oxfordianfoundation.com

American Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Learning Based Optimal Control for Nonlinear Robotic Systems: Integrating Dynamic Programming, Analytical Rigid Body Models, and Diffusion Policies

Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering ETH Zurich Switzerland

Abstract

The convergence of optimal control theory, robotics, and machine learning has produced a new generation of methodologies capable of addressing high dimensional nonlinear dynamical systems. Classical dynamic programming, rooted in the foundational work of Bellman, provides a principled framework for sequential decision making but suffers from the curse of dimensionality. Trajectory optimization methods such as Differential Dynamic Programming and modern numerical techniques enable efficient local optimization but remain sensitive to initialization and model inaccuracies. Concurrently, advances in rigid body dynamics libraries, including the development of analytical derivatives and fast forward and inverse dynamics algorithms, have significantly reduced computational overhead in robot modeling. In parallel, machine learning has introduced nonparametric representations, Gaussian process based dynamic programming, deep neural approximations for stochastic control, and diffusion based policy learning frameworks that challenge conventional paradigms.

This article presents a comprehensive theoretical integration of these traditions. Drawing strictly from the referenced works, it synthesizes trajectory based nonparametric value representation, random state sampling in dynamic programming, Gaussian process control, analytical rigid body dynamics, machine learning assisted model predictive control, diffusion policy learning, and neural approximations of Pontryagin based optimality conditions. The research develops a unified perspective in which analytical physics based modeling and data driven learning are not competing alternatives but complementary layers within a hierarchical optimal control architecture.

The methodology elaborates a conceptual framework combining exact rigid body derivatives from the Pinocchio library with learning based policy representations trained via stochastic optimal control matching and diffusion models. A detailed theoretical comparison between classical feedback control design and modern deep learning approximations is conducted. The results section provides an extensive descriptive analysis of how these combined approaches improve scalability, generalization, and closed loop robustness in robotic manipulators and aerial platforms such as micro quadrotors and lightweight robotic arms.

The discussion critically examines computational complexity, generalization across domains, and the epistemological implications of replacing explicit dynamic programming recursions with learned approximations. The article concludes by outlining a path toward interpretable, scalable, and computationally efficient learning based optimal control for complex robotic systems.

Keywords

References

πŸ“„ 1. Atkeson C and Morimoto J. Nonparametric representation of policies and value functions: A trajectory based approach. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc. 2002.
πŸ“„ 2. Atkeson C and Stephens B. Random sampling of states in dynamic programming. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc. 2007.
πŸ“„ 3. Bellman R E. Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press. 1957.
πŸ“„ 4. Betts J T. Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics. 1998.
πŸ“„ 5. Bischoff R et al. The KUKA DLR Lightweight Robot arm a new reference platform for robotics research and manufacturing. ISR 2010 and ROBOTIK 2010. VDE. 2010.
πŸ“„ 6. Borgwardt K M et al. Integrating structured biological data by kernel maximum mean discrepancy. Bioinformatics. 2006.
πŸ“„ 7. Bottcher L Antulov Fantulin N and Asikis T. AI Pontryagin or how artificial neural networks learn to control dynamical systems. Nature Communications. 2022.
πŸ“„ 8. Bouabdallah S Murrieri P and Siegwart R. Design and control of an indoor micro quadrotor. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2004.
πŸ“„ 9. Carpentier J and Mansard N. Analytical derivatives of rigid body dynamics algorithms. Robotics Science and Systems. 2018.
πŸ“„ 10. Carpentier J et al. The Pinocchio C plus plus library: A fast and flexible implementation of rigid body dynamics algorithms and their analytical derivatives. IEEE SICE International Symposium on System Integration. 2019.
πŸ“„ 11. Carpentier J et al. Pinocchio: Fast forward and inverse dynamics for poly articulated systems. 2015 to 2021.
πŸ“„ 12. Chi C Xu Z Feng S Cousineau E Du Y Burchfiel B Tedrake R and Song S. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion. International Journal of Robotics Research. 2025.
πŸ“„ 13. Clevert D Unterthiner T and Hochreiter S. Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units. International Conference on Learning Representations. 2016.
πŸ“„ 14. Coates A Abbeel P and Ng A Y. Learning for control from multiple demonstrations. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2008.
πŸ“„ 15. Deisenroth M P Rasmussen C E and Peters J. Gaussian process dynamic programming. Neurocomputing. 2009.
πŸ“„ 16. Domingo Enrich C Han J Amos B Bruna J and Chen R T Q. Stochastic optimal control matching. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2024.
πŸ“„ 17. E W Han J and Long J. Empowering optimal control with machine learning: A perspective from model predictive control. IFAC PapersOnLine. 2022.
πŸ“„ 18. E W Han J and Zhang L. Machine learning assisted modeling. Physics Today. 2021.
πŸ“„ 19. Franklin G F Powell J D and Emami Naeini A. Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. Upper Saddle River. 2002.
πŸ“„ 20. Glorot X and Bengio Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 2010.
πŸ“„ 21. Han J and E W. Deep learning approximation for stochastic control problems. arXiv. 2016.
πŸ“„ 22. Hegde S Batra S Zentner K and Sukhatme G. Generating behaviorally diverse policies with latent diffusion models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023.
πŸ“„ 23. Hu W Zhao Y E W Han J and Long J. Learning free terminal time optimal closed loop control of manipulators. American Control Conference. 2025.
πŸ“„ 24. Jacobson D H and Mayne D Q. Differential Dynamic Programming. Elsevier Publishing Company. 1970.
Views: 0    Downloads: 0
Views
Downloads