eISSN: Applied editor@oxfordianfoundation.com
Open Access

Emergency Remote Teaching in Higher Education: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategic Adaptations During Global Crises

University of Lagos, Nigeria

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented disruptions in global higher education, compelling institutions to adopt emergency remote teaching (ERT) as a rapid response strategy. Unlike structured online learning, ERT is characterized by immediate deployment without prior instructional design preparation, relying heavily on available digital infrastructure and the adaptability of both instructors and learners (Hodges et al., 2020; Ferri et al., 2020). This research article explores the multifaceted dimensions of ERT, including its theoretical underpinnings, practical implementations, challenges, and potential for long-term transformation in higher education systems. Drawing on literature spanning education theory, technology adoption, and crisis management, the study delineates the pedagogical, cognitive, and socio-emotional implications of ERT for faculty, students, and administrative stakeholders (Grammes, 2020; Ozge Misirli & Ergulec, 2021). The methodology involved comprehensive qualitative analysis of existing studies, webinars, and institutional reports to construct a holistic understanding of ERT practices across diverse educational contexts. Findings reveal that ERT, while initially reactive, offered opportunities for accelerated digital literacy, the adoption of Open Educational Resources (OERs), and the reconsideration of pedagogical models for resilience and flexibility (Africa, 2020; Patel, 2020; Mavridi, 2020). However, challenges persist, including technology accessibility, faculty preparedness, learner engagement, and the psychological stress associated with abrupt transitions (Al-Naabi et al., 2021; Colclasure et al., 2021). The discussion integrates theoretical perspectives on online learning with empirical insights, highlighting the necessity for sustainable strategies, robust professional development frameworks, and institutional support systems. This article concludes that ERT, though born out of crisis, can catalyze long-term innovations in higher education if embedded within carefully designed, context-sensitive, and equity-oriented pedagogical frameworks. The implications extend beyond the pandemic, offering guidance for universities seeking to strengthen resilience against future disruptions while enhancing the quality, accessibility, and inclusivity of higher education.

Keywords

References

πŸ“„ 1. Africa, O. (2020). Emergency Remote Teaching - AAU / OER Africa webinar series.
πŸ“„ 2. Al-Naabi, I., Kelder, J., & Carr, A. (2021). Preparing teachers for emergency remote teaching: A professional development framework for teachers in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(5), 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/jutlp.v18i5.4
πŸ“„ 3. Ayebi-Arthur, K. (2017). E-learning, resilience and change in higher education: Helping a university cope after a natural disaster. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(5), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017751712
πŸ“„ 4. Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1993). Research in education (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
πŸ“„ 5. Blaylock, R., Bradley, E.D., Bunger, A., & Sharp, T. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in linguistics during the early COVID-19 pandemic. Proc Ling Soc Amer 6(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v6i2.5111
πŸ“„ 6. Charles Hodges, S. M. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Why IT matters to Higher Education - Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
πŸ“„ 7. Colclasure, B., Marlier, A., Durham, M., Brooks, T., & Kerr, M. (2021). Identified challenges from faculty teaching at predominantly undergraduate institutions after abrupt transition to emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(9), 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090556
πŸ“„ 8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
πŸ“„ 9. Ferri, P., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020, October). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 1-18. doi:10.3390/soc10040086
πŸ“„ 10. Grammes, T. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic, emergency remote teaching and social science education. Journal of Social Science Education, 19, 1-7. doi:10.4119/jsse-3544
πŸ“„ 11. Mamounas, E. P., Jeong, J. H., Wickerham, D. L., Smith, R. E., Ganz, P. A., Land, S. R., ... & Wolmark, N. (2008). Benefit from exemestane as extended adjuvant therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen: intention-to-treat analysis of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-33 trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(12), 1965-1971.
πŸ“„ 12. Mavridi, S. (2020, July 24). From emergency remote teaching to sustainable online education. England/Australia. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/ivPeLEzk98Y
πŸ“„ 13. Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152-159.
πŸ“„ 14. OUM (Open University Malaysia) (2019). Master of Education, January 2019 Semester, HMEF5123, Models and Strategies of Teaching Sungai Petani Learning Centre. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/436780644/MODELS-OF-TEACHING-ASSIGNMENTOUM
πŸ“„ 15. Ozge Misirli, F., & Ergulec, F. (2021, March 29). Emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: Parents experiences and perspectives. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-02105-20
πŸ“„ 16. Patel, M. A. (2020). The OER - A teaching-learning tool in the times of COVID-19 in India. GLOKALde, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.glokalde.com/pdf/issues/18/Article8.pdf
Views: 0    Downloads: 0
Views
Downloads