eISSN: Applied editor@oxfordianfoundation.com
Open Access

Exploring Self-Regulated Learning and Language Learning Strategies: Implications for EFL Speaking Proficiency

Faculty of Education, University of Toronto Scarborough, Canada

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) has emerged as a pivotal construct in contemporary educational research, particularly within the context of language acquisition. This study investigates the intricate interplay between language learning strategies, motivation, and self-regulation, emphasizing their cumulative influence on speaking proficiency among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Drawing from a synthesis of theoretical frameworks and empirical studies, the research examines cognitive, metacognitive, and socio-affective strategies, highlighting the nuanced ways in which learners navigate the complexities of oral communication in English. Prior literature underscores the pivotal role of learner autonomy, goal setting, and strategic planning in enhancing speaking efficacy (Abdul Rahman, 2015; Aregu, 2013). Moreover, motivation has been consistently linked to learners’ willingness to engage in practice opportunities and overcome affective barriers (Chang & Liu, 2013; Artino & Stephens, 2007). This study adopts a descriptive-analytical approach, integrating qualitative and quantitative perspectives to provide a comprehensive understanding of strategy utilization and self-regulatory behaviors in EFL contexts. The findings elucidate that learners who employ structured self-regulated learning strategies demonstrate higher engagement, increased speaking confidence, and measurable improvements in oral performance. Importantly, the study highlights the significance of feedback mechanisms, reflective practices, and personalized learning pathways as catalysts for sustained improvement. The discussion critically evaluates existing pedagogical approaches, identifies potential limitations in current instructional designs, and proposes future research avenues aimed at optimizing speaking instruction for diverse EFL populations. The implications of this research extend beyond the immediate classroom environment, offering insights for curriculum designers, teacher educators, and policymakers interested in fostering effective language learning ecosystems that integrate cognitive, motivational, and metacognitive dimensions.

Keywords

References

📄 1. Abdul Rahman, N. (2015). The Relationship between Language Learning Strategies and Students' Motivation in Learning English as A Second Language. Jurnal teknikal Sosial Sains. Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 5(2), 45-76.
📄 2. Aregu, B. B. (2013). Enhancing self-regulated learning in teaching spoken communication: Does it affect speaking efficacy and performance? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 96–109.
📄 3. Artino, A.R., & Stephens, J.M. (2007). Motivation and Self-Regulation in Online Courses: A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduate and Graduate Students. The Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Sponsored by the Research and Theory Division.
📄 4. Boekaerts, M. (1996a). Coping with stress in childhood and adolescence. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of Coping: Theories, Research, Application (pp. 452–484). New York, NY: Wiley.
📄 5. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies & Academic Achievement in Online Higher Education Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.
📄 6. Brown, J. M., Miller, W. R., & Lawendowski, L. A. (1999). The self-regulation questionnaire. In L. Vande Creek & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book (pp. 281–292). FL: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange.
📄 7. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Revolution in Education Research, 65, 245–281. doi: 10.3102/0034654 3065003245
📄 8. Carson, J. G., & Longhini, A. (2002). Focusing on learning styles and strategies: A study in an immersion setting. Language Learning, 52, 401-438.
📄 9. Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Language Teaching Approaches: an Overview. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd Ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
📄 10. Chang, C.H., & Liu, H.J. (2013). Language learning strategy use and language learning motivation of Taiwanese EFL university students. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10, 196–209.
📄 11. Cenoz, J. (2015). Content based instruction and language integrated learning: the same different? Journal of Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8-24. doi: 10.1080/2014.1000922
📄 12. Hill, R. (2012). What sample size is enough in internet survey research? Journal of Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 6(3–4). Retrieved from http://www.dx.org.researchgate.net
📄 13. Juhana. (2012). Psychological factors that hinder students from speaking in English class. Journal of Education and Practice, 12, 2222–1735. Retrieved from http://www.iiste.org
📄 14. Kosar, G., & Bedir, H. (2014). Strategies based instruction: a means of improving adult EFL learners’ speaking skill. Journal of Language Academy, 12, 2342–0251. Retrieved from http://www.doi.org
📄 15. Khairuddin. (2005). The effectiveness of discussion method toward speaking skill for the second grade students of SMPN 1 Praya Lombok Tengah in the school year 2004/2005. Unpublished undergraduate thesis of STKIP Hamzanwadi Selong.
📄 16. Moedjito. (2016). Basic statistic for research in language education. Selong: Yuma Pustaka.
📄 17. Nuraini, K. (2016). The barriers of teaching speaking English for EFL learners. Journal of English, Language, Literature and Teaching, 14, 2528–0066. Retrieved from http://www.journalecth.ac.id
📄 18. Nurmasya’, Anita. (2014). Improving the speaking ability. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta University Press.
📄 19. Sunarwan, Aisyah. (2014). The effectiveness of content based instruction to teach speaking viewed from students’ creativity, 3(1), 2089–3345. Retrieved from http://www.ccsnet.org/journal/indexphp/elt/articl71252
Views: 0    Downloads: 0
Views
Downloads