eISSN: Applied editor@oxfordianfoundation.com
Open Access

Integrative Advances in Particle Swarm Optimization–Driven Path Planning and Autonomous Intelligent Systems: A Comprehensive Theoretical and Applied Analysis

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Autonomous intelligent systems have emerged as one of the most transformative technological paradigms of the twenty-first century, reshaping domains ranging from mobile robotics and unmanned aerial vehicles to autonomous driving, healthcare automation, and Industry 4.0 ecosystems. At the heart of these systems lies the problem of decision-making under uncertainty, where path planning and navigation represent foundational challenges. Among the diverse optimization paradigms proposed to address these challenges, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and its numerous improved, hybrid, and multi-objective variants have demonstrated remarkable adaptability, scalability, and conceptual simplicity. This research article presents an extensive, theory-driven, and application-oriented synthesis of PSO-based path planning methodologies within the broader context of autonomous systems and artificial intelligence. Drawing strictly on the provided references, the article explores the evolution of PSO techniques, including adaptive weighted PSO, quantum-behaved PSO, crisscross learning strategies, fuzzy-enhanced multi-objective PSO, and safety-aware spherical vector-based PSO, and examines their deployment across mobile robots, unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned surface vehicles, and autonomous driving systems. Beyond algorithmic mechanics, the study situates PSO-driven path planning within socio-technical systems, highlighting its implications for safety assurance, explainability, human–machine interaction, and ethical deployment. The methodology adopted is qualitative and integrative, relying on deep theoretical elaboration, cross-domain synthesis, and comparative reasoning rather than numerical experimentation. The results demonstrate that PSO-based approaches provide a unifying optimization framework capable of accommodating multi-objective trade-offs, environmental uncertainty, and dynamic constraints, while remaining extensible through hybridization with fuzzy logic, evolutionary learning, and safety metrics. The discussion critically evaluates limitations related to convergence reliability, explainability, and real-world validation, and outlines future research directions that emphasize interpretable autonomy, safety-critical verification, and cross-sectoral integration. The article concludes that PSO-based path planning is not merely an algorithmic solution but a conceptual bridge linking optimization theory, autonomous intelligence, and socio-technical trust in intelligent systems.

Keywords

References

📄 1. Aguirre, S., & Rodriguez, A. (2017). Automation of a business process using robotic process automation (RPA): A case study. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66963-2_7
📄 2. Amrutkar, C., Satav, A., Sonawwanay, P. D., & Pawar, A. H. (2024). Overview of autonomous vehicle and its challenges. In Techno-Societal 2022. ICATSA 2022 (pp. 243–251). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34648-4_25
📄 3. Aouf, A., Boussaid, L., & Sakly, A. (2019). Same fuzzy logic controller for two-wheeled mobile robot navigation in strange environments. Journal of Robotics, 2019, 2465219. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2465219
📄 4. Bajwa, J., Munir, U., Nori, A., & Williams, B. (2021). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthcare Journal, 8(2), e188–e194. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0095
📄 5. Brown, B. (2016). The social life of autonomous cars. MIT Technology Review, 50(2).
📄 6. Chaurasia, A., Parashar, B., & Kautish, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and automation for Industry 4.0. In S. Kautish et al. (Eds.), Computational intelligence for modern business systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5354-7_18
📄 7. Fu, Y., Ding, M., & Zhou, C. (2011). Phase angle-encoded and quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization applied to three-dimensional route planning for UAV. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A, 42, 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2169983
📄 8. Guo, X., Ji, M., Zhao, Z., Wen, D., & Zhang, W. (2020). Global path planning and multi-objective path control for unmanned surface vehicle based on modified particle swarm optimization algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 216, 107693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107693
📄 9. Jingjing, H., Xun, L., Wenzhe, M., Xin, Y., & Dong, Y. (2021). Path planning method for mobile robot based on multiple improved PSO. In Proceedings of the 40th Chinese Control Conference (pp. 1485–1489). IEEE.
📄 10. Liang, B., Zhao, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). A hybrid particle swarm optimization with crisscross learning strategy. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 105, 104418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104418
📄 11. Liu, W., Wang, Z., Yuan, Y., Zeng, N., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2019). A novel sigmoid-function-based adaptive weighted particle swarm optimizer. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 51, 1085–1093. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2019.2926714
📄 12. Omeiza, D., Webb, H., Jirotka, M., & Kunze, L. (2022). Explanations in autonomous driving: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(8), 10142–10162. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3122865
📄 13. Phung, M. D., & Ha, Q. P. (2021). Safety-enhanced UAV path planning with spherical vector-based particle swarm optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 107, 107376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107376
📄 14. Sathiya, V., Chinnadurai, M., & Ramabalan, S. (2022). Mobile robot path planning using fuzzy enhanced improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization (FIMOPSO). Expert Systems with Applications, 198, 116875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116875
📄 15. Thammachantuek, I., & Ketcham, M. (2022). Path planning for autonomous mobile robots using multi-objective evolutionary particle swarm optimization. PLoS ONE, 17, e0271924. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271924
📄 16. Xu, Z., Zhang, E. Z., & Chen, Q. W. (2020). Rotary unmanned aerial vehicles path planning in rough terrain based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 31, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSEE.2020.000011
📄 17. Yan, X., Feng, S., LeBlanc, D. J., Flannagan, C., & Liu, H. X. (2024). Evaluation of automated driving system safety metrics with logged vehicle trajectory data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(8), 8913–8925. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3397849
Views: 0    Downloads: 0
Views
Downloads

Similar Articles

11-12 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.